Site Tools


cm3203_final_report

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
cm3203_final_report [2024/03/17 14:05] – [Assessment Criteria] scmfclcm3203_final_report [2024/03/19 22:12] (current) – [Assessment Criteria] scmfcl
Line 54: Line 54:
 Before you submit the final version, you should discuss the report with your supervisor, who can give you general guidance on the structure and what to write as feed-forward towards the final report assessment. Make sure you arrange this well in advance of the submission deadline so that you can agree upon a timeline for this, and there is enough time for your supervisor to look at a draft. You may, for example, discuss an outline of the report with chapter and section headings with your supervisor and later on discuss specific questions you are having on the content. Before you submit the final version, you should discuss the report with your supervisor, who can give you general guidance on the structure and what to write as feed-forward towards the final report assessment. Make sure you arrange this well in advance of the submission deadline so that you can agree upon a timeline for this, and there is enough time for your supervisor to look at a draft. You may, for example, discuss an outline of the report with chapter and section headings with your supervisor and later on discuss specific questions you are having on the content.
  
-The final report is worth **95%** of the module's total mark. After the submission deadline, your supervisor and moderator assess the final report independently, giving an individual mark out of 95. A combined mark will be agreed upon based on the individual marks between your supervisor and moderator in a separate discussion after the individual marks have been given. A total mark for each assessor will be computed as the sum of their initial plan (out of 5) and final report mark (out of 95). If these two marks differ by more than 10, a third marker will be appointed to decide upon a final mark based on the individual and combined report marks. If the two marks differ by less or equal to 10, the combined mark agreed upon by the supervisor and moderator (out of 95) and the average initial plan mark (out of 5) will be the total mark for the module. After this process, an external examiner will check the report marks, and the exam board will confirm the marks. You will then receive your official mark for the module via SIMS. Once you have received your mark via SIMS, you can ask your supervisor for informal feedback on your work. Before then, your supervisor or anyone else cannot confirm your mark.+The final report is worth **95%** of the module's total mark. After the submission deadline, your supervisor and moderator assess the final report independently, giving an individual mark out of 95. A combined mark will be agreed upon based on the individual marks between your supervisor and moderator in a separate discussion after the individual marks have been given. A total mark for each assessor will be computed as the sum of their initial plan (out of 5) and final report mark (out of 95). If these two marks differ by more than 10, a third marker will be appointed to decide upon a final mark based on the individual and combined report marks. If the two marks differ by less or equal to 10, the sum of the mark agreed upon by the supervisor and moderator (out of 95) and the average initial plan mark (out of 5) will be the total mark for the module. After this process, an external examiner will check the report marks, and the exam board will confirm the marks. You will then receive your official mark for the module via SIMS. Once you have received your mark via SIMS, you can ask your supervisor for informal feedback on your work (e.g. contact them by e-mail). Before then, your supervisor or anyone else cannot confirm your mark.
  
 The criteria for assessing the final report are listed below. Please read these carefully, as it will help you see what your assessors will look for in your report. Also, take into account what you promised to produce for the final report in your initial plan, your supervisor's and moderator's comments on this on PATS, and any further discussions with your supervisor (as you may have changed the deliverables from the initial plan in discussion with your supervisors, etc). The criteria for assessing the final report are listed below. Please read these carefully, as it will help you see what your assessors will look for in your report. Also, take into account what you promised to produce for the final report in your initial plan, your supervisor's and moderator's comments on this on PATS, and any further discussions with your supervisor (as you may have changed the deliverables from the initial plan in discussion with your supervisors, etc).
Line 79: Line 79:
 The scale for this assessment is: The scale for this assessment is:
   * **Fail** (0-29%) - //Incomplete solution:// poor understanding or ability to apply the skill; solution is incomplete or irrelevant.   * **Fail** (0-29%) - //Incomplete solution:// poor understanding or ability to apply the skill; solution is incomplete or irrelevant.
-  * **Marginal Fail** (30-39%) - //Needs significant improvement:// limited understanding or ability to apply the skill; solution demonstrates some awareness the problem.+  * **Marginal Fail** (30-39%) - //Needs significant improvement:// limited understanding or ability to apply the skill; solution demonstrates some awareness of the problem.
   * **Pass** (40-49%) - //Meets minimum expectations:// basic understanding and application of the skill; solution meets minimum requirements.   * **Pass** (40-49%) - //Meets minimum expectations:// basic understanding and application of the skill; solution meets minimum requirements.
   * **Adequate** (50-59%) - //Meets expectations with some issues:// competent understanding and application of the skill in common situations; solution is good with some issues.   * **Adequate** (50-59%) - //Meets expectations with some issues:// competent understanding and application of the skill in common situations; solution is good with some issues.
cm3203_final_report.txt · Last modified: 2024/03/19 22:12 by scmfcl