This is the main page for information about the 30 credit two-semester final year project module CM3303.
* CM3303 Guide: The complete guide for CM3303 on a single page for printing/saving as PDF.
At the beginning of the third year you are going to select your final year project. Below are guides on how to propose projects and select your project using PATS.
This is an overview of the expected deliverables and related tasks you have to execute for your project. Details on these deliverables and tasks are available on the linked pages. You also find the required deliverables with their submission deadlines under your PATS project details.
For information about how to submit a report via PATS please see the Submission Guide. Note that in order to get an extension to the submission deadline the general coursework submission extension guidelines apply.
These guides are meant to help you produce good final year project reports. A good report is one that presents your project work concisely and effectively. It should contain various materials relevant to the work you have undertaken in respect of your project; it should be organised into a logical framework; and it should be supported by written material that follows well-established academic conventions in a consistent fashion.
An important point to remember is that the report should describe your work. Large chunks of bookwork describing standard material are unnecessary. You should simply refer to such material where necessary - assume that your reader is a competent computer or information systems theorist or practitioner. The guidelines here are arranged roughly in the order that you will need them.
Your project supervisor will guide you on what it is reasonable to expect a project in your chosen topic to deliver. However, all projects are required to justify all decisions made at every stage of research and the development of appropriate deliverables, including the choice of approach.
Further information on how to use PATS, prepare the various deliverables in a suitable format and related technical issues are available in these guides:
You can propose your own project for your final year project or take on a project proposed by staff. Here we discuss how to write and submit your own project proposal. The process is the same for students and members of staff, and both kinds of proposal should provide the information outlined here.
Please see the Project Supervision entry for how to find a supervisor for your own proposal or agree supervision of a staff proposal. Deadlines for the selection will be announced by e-mail and are also visible in the PATS Tasks section.
The purpose of the project is, in the context of the degree you are studying, to integrate various aspects of the taught material and to demonstrate your (academic) research skills and your (professional) analysis, design and implementation skills. It gives you the opportunity to conduct in-depth work on a substantial problem to show individual creativity and originality, to apply where appropriate knowledge, skills and techniques taught throughout the degree programme to further oral and written communication skills, and to practise investigative, problem-solving, management and other transferable skills. The management and execution of the project is your responsibility, but you should seek and take advantage of advice from your supervisor.
As a general guideline a good project aims to solve a problem related to your field of study. You can pick a general area you are interested in and try to find a specific problem you could be working on. Instead of solving a complete project you can also work on a partial solution or some specific aspect of a larger problem, possibly simplified to make it feasible for a final year project. If you are not sure on the specifics you can also discuss a rough initial idea for a project with a member of staff to find something suitable, that can be executed in the context of a final year project. Out of such discussions often very interesting project ideas can arise.
When you choose a project, you should do so carefully, to reflect the focus of the degree programme you are enrolled in, your personal interests (the project needs to keep you interested for the duration of the project) and the ability of the academic staff to support you throughout your project. Projects vary widely in the problem they address and the products they deliver at the end. While the main product of some projects is a piece of software or hardware, other projects produce a systems model or design, and yet others may address some research hypothesis using a theoretical or experimental approach. This means not every project produces a piece of software. In brief, the better defined the problem that your project addresses, the further through the systems lifecycle you should expect to progress in the course of your project. If instead you are addressing a research hypothesis, your main product may be the evaluation of some experiments or a theoretical result.
So, for example, a project that seeks to develop a logistics planning system for a small business or voluntary organisation would be expected to provide a fully operational, fully tested program that meets all the identified needs of the client. However, a project that aims to validate a government policy in a particular area might only achieve the development of a model to confidently simulate the main factors influencing that policy, and identify the research agenda in terms of specifying precisely the data requirements to allow a full investigation of the relevant factors. A scientifically oriented project may focus on the practical or theoretical evaluation of a new rendering approach and compare it with existing approaches, which may involve some implementation, but does not require fully functional software.
To submit a new project proposal, log into your PATS account. On the left navigation bar you will see a “My proposals” link which takes you to a section listing your own proposals. There you can add new proposals, edit or delete existing proposals and make them available for selection.
To create a new proposal go to the “New Proposal” tab and enter a proposal title and description. If you are a student the proposal will automatically be assigned your degree scheme (Please check in your profile that your degree scheme there is correct and contact the project coordinator if this needs to be amended). Staff should select the degree schemes for which their proposal is suitable from the list provided.
When choosing a title for your proposal make sure it refers to the core topic of your project. Do not make the title too general (like “A Computer Game”, instead of the specific type of game you wish to write) or provide too much details (“A System to Manage the Selection, Allocation, Deliverable Submission and Marking of Final Year Projects”, instead of “Final Year Project Management”).
In the description of your project briefly give the general context of your project and then describe what you intend to do for the project in detail. Outline the main issues you wish to address with the project and what you intent to produce by the end of the project. Also describe any special resources you need, e.g. non-standard hardware, special software, etc. Staff may also wish to discuss the skills needed to execute the project and the skills that must be acquired during the project.
You may also wish to discuss ideas for projects with staff members who may be interested in supervising this. This can especially be helpful to refine your idea.
In the initial phase of project selection you will only be able to propose projects, but not select projects. This will become available at a later time and will be announced by e-mail. Then student and staff proposals are available for viewing, expressing interest and arranging supervision (see Project Supervision). Only projects marked as available can be viewed by others during this phase. You can change the availability status of a proposal on PATS at any time. Note that proposals selected for supervision will automatically become unavailable. (Members of staff are able to make proposals available again if they think more than one student can in principle work on the project, but the work students dp at the same time must still be sufficiently different to qualify as separate project).
You can submit more than one project proposal, but please keep the number of proposals reasonable and rather make sure you write one or two really good proposals. This will make it much more likely that you find a member of staff to supervise your project. Of course you can only do one project and once supervision with a member of staff is agreed via PATS (only staff can choose to supervise a project), this can only be changed in very exceptional cases.
There is no guarantee that there will definitely be a member of staff who will supervise any of the projects you have proposed. This will depend on the quality of your proposal and staff's interest and expertise. Alternatively you can select a staff proposal instead or even despite having made a good proposal, if you are more interested in this.
To a somewhat lesser degree this equally applies to staff proposals - there is no guarantee to find a student who can or wants to do a staff project, nor do members of staff have to supervise all their own proposals. However, a student who does not select a proposal will be assigned a random member of staff as supervisor.
After proposals have been submitted they will eventually become available for arranging supervision. This will be announced separately by e-mail. Your own proposals can then be viewed by members of staff and staff proposals will become available for viewing. During this phase it is still possible to edit your proposals and add additional proposals to the system.
Suitable navigation links will then be available in PATS to view proposals and express interest in them. Note that expressing interest simply indicates to the proposer that you may want to do the project, but it does not mean supervision is agreed. Members of staff can see which proposals you are interested in and you can see who is interested in your proposals.
During this time you should contact members of staff to discuss the proposals and agree supervision. You must discuss a proposal with a member of staff before supervision can be agreed and usually this should be done in person.
If a member of staff is happy to take you on for one of their projects or to supervise your project they can select to supervise you on PATS directly. This will create a project that will become available in the navigation bar. Once this happened you have a project agreed and cannot select any other project. This usually cannot be reversed. So make sure that once you agree the supervision of a project, this has actually also been done on PATS. Note that members of staff can only choose to supervise you on a project in which you have shown interest.
Please mention your degree scheme to the staff members when you see them. This is to ensure that the suitability of your proposed project for your degree scheme could be checked by the staff members. You may also like to discuss the scope of your proposed project with the staff member, i.e. whether the project will allow you get a pass, 2-1 or first class.
Note, that after supervision has been agreed the proposal accepted will become unavailable and the students other proposals will also be marked as unavailable. A member of staff can make their own proposals available again, if they think there is sufficient scope for more than one student to work on different aspects.
If you do not select a proposal by deadline then you will be assigned a random supervisor at the beginning of the project year. This is not in your interest as you may well get the worst possible arrangement. Even if you cannot find a perfect proposal and/or cannot find a supervisor for your own proposal, it is still better for you to select a proposal than not selecting anything at all.
Dates and deadlines will be announced by e-mail and are also available in the PATS Tasks section..
Members of staff available to supervise undergraduate projects:
The final year project is a substantial part of your degree. It can have a major effect on the degree class you are awarded and even whether or not you pass the degree. The initial project plan is to make sure you understand what your project requires you to do and how you are going to finish it successfully. You must submit an initial project plan at the beginning of your project.
The initial plan is marked by your supervisor and moderator independently. Before you submit the final version you should discuss the plan with your supervisor to make sure both of you agree on what your project entails.
We suggest that you write an initial version of your project plan and arrange meetings with your supervisor to discuss it and revise the plan. If you are not sure what to write in the plan, please discuss this with your supervisor before you write the draft.
You can find the deadline for submitting your initial plan on PATS under your project details. Note that there is little time to complete the plan, so make sure you start early and arrange the supervisor meetings well in advance. For information about how to submit your initial plan via PATS please see the Submission Guide.
Finally, note that this is an initial plan, and you can, and most likely should, adjust the plan as you progress. Note, however, that with the initial plan you are prescribing what you intend to deliver at the various stages of the project as explained below.
For the initial plan you should consider, after discussion with your supervisor, whether the project will require research that needs ethical approval. See School guidance on research ethics for further details. If it is necessary include the required steps in your work plan and briefly discuss the issues in the initial plan document.
Your initial plan should be at most 2,000 words, excluding any figures and tales. It should contain the following information:
The title of the initial plan document should be “Initial Plan” followed by the title of your project. List yourself as author and also list your supervisor with their roles. Please also list the module number and module title you are taking and credits due for this module.
The first section of the document should be a brief description of your project outlining the problem you are trying to solve, its context, and overall aims. You can adapt the proposal used to select your project. Half a page to one page should be sufficient for this.
The second section of the document should be a list of more detailed aims and objectives for your project. These are statements of what you set out to achieve with your project. Try to be as specific as possible at this stage, but avoid getting into too many details that may change later. It's only the main results and components of your project you should list. A bullet point list with at most one level of sub-points is usually sufficient.
The last section of your initial plan should consist of a time plan stating what you are working on when. This should include clear milestones of what you expect to achieve by which date and also show how you intent to achieve these milestones.
Make sure you clearly describe what you intend to include in the deliverables required for your project type, i.e. state what you will produce for the interim and final report, as applicable for your project module. Link the deliverables to your time plan, such that you actually plan to deliver them when they are due.
Your time plan should further have at least two scheduled review meetings with your supervisor. You should typically see your supervisor once a week for a shorter time or once every two weeks for a longer time. The details of these arrangements are for you to agree with your supervisor. However, in your time plan you should mark out special meetings with your supervisor where you are reviewing your progress since the last such meeting (or from the beginning) and adjust your plan for the project based on the outcome of this meeting. These review meetings are mandatory and are considered as part of the mark of the reports (see marking criteria there).
You are free to choose the work plan format that you think is best suited for your project and working style. This may be a Gantt chart, but sometimes it may also be sufficient to simply list in sequence what you are working on with a time-scale and milestones/deliverables. Usually a weekly scale for the work plan is a good choice. Take note of the deadlines for the deliverables as listed in your PATS project description when you develop the work plan and also consider any other commitments and busy times such as the exam periods.
This section is only relevant if you have to produce an interim and a final report for your project. Note that the final report should not repeat content of the interim report. They should rather be two reports that overall make up your project report.
What to include in the two reports depends on the nature of your project. Your interim report should provide the results of the first stage of the project, representing about 25% of the total project work. This would usually be the results of the background study and a detailed analysis of the problem with a description of an approach of how to address the problem. For some projects, e.g., it may also contain an initial version of a final deliverable or some other building block of the overall project. It is not necessarily everything you have done by its due date (this depends on your time plan and other commitments), but is rather a first deliverable of your project due by the end of autumn term.
The final report contains the overall project findings and achievements and the complete set of deliverables developed for the project to account for 75% of the project. The report should not repeat the contents of the interim report, but may refer to it and expand on it.
Your project plan effectively defines what should go into which report. Hence, you should carefully discuss this with your supervisor to make sure there is enough for 25% in the interim report and you neither try to do too much or too little for the interim report.
Your supervisor and moderator will mark your plan according to the following criteria:
on the following scale:
Supervisor and moderator will leave comments about your plan explaining any concerns they may have and their expectations regarding the aims and objectives and deliverables. Make sure you consider these when executing the project.
You must submit a final report worth 95% of the total project mark, which should cover the overall project background, approach, findings and achievements. You will also have to submit a complete set of the deliverables developed for the project, as specified in your initial plan (including any source code and soft system models). This involves the development of some tangible piece of software, hardware, system design or theoretical result. It need not necessarily be a usable finished product. Instead it could be, for example, an extension to an existing system or a prototype built as part of a feasibility study. Deliverables do not necessarily have to be programs, but could be in non-executable form, for example, an SSM conceptual model. This must be submitted towards the end of the semester. See your project details in PATS for the submission deadline.
Please see your initial plan in which you should have clearly outlined the deliverables for the final report. Your supervisor and/or moderator may have left additional comments on your plan on PATS to tell you whether these deliverables are suitable and what they expect for the final report. Check the comments on PATS for your report. Your deliverables may be adjusted based on your findings since the initial plan. If so, justify this in the report. Also discuss carefully with your supervisor what you should be including in the final report.
The final report should be at most 15,000 words long. General guidance on project report structures is available in Arranging Material and Structuring the Project Report. A possible structure for your final report is:
|Table of Contents|
|Table of Figures|
|5.||Results and Evaluation|
|8.||Reflection on Learning|
|Table of Abbreviations|
If you are implementing a piece of software the “Approach” section above would be the “Specification and Design”. For a project addressing a “softer” problem the Approach section may be “Selection of Approach”. If instead you intend to compare algorithms it may be “Alternative Designs and Final Algorithm“ and if you intend to design and and analyse an algorithm it could be “Algorithm Designs”.
If you are implementing a piece of software or you intend to design and analyse algorithms the “Implementation” section is quite suitable. For a project addressing a “softer” problem it may instead be “Deliverables from Selected Approach”. If you intend to compare algorithms it may on “Implementation of Algorithms”.
Then present the results of your work and evaluate these results with suitable evidence, discussing the advantages and weaknesses of your approach. You may also consider a section describing the design and results of experiments here, in particular if your project involves evaluating algorithms or similar. The “Conclusions” section should conclude your project overall and your report should end with a reflection on learning.
Do not take any of these section headings as fixed, but instead consider them as a guide. You should adjust the structure of the final report to your specific project and choose suitable sections to represent this. Please discuss the structure and contents of your report with your supervisor.
After the submission deadline your supervisor and moderator assess the final report independently of each other. In addition a project viva will be held to demonstrate and discuss your project after the complete project has been submitted. The format of the viva varies depending on the project, but generally consists of a demonstration or presentation of the deliverables followed by a discussion of various questions from the supervisor and moderator relating to the project.
A mark out of 95 is given on the final report, representing 95% of the total mark. The marks awarded for the initial plan will be added to the marks given for the final report to give a total mark from each assessor. If their total marks differ by less than 10, the final mark for the project will be the average between the supervisor's and moderator's total mark. If the difference is 10 or greater, they meet together to discuss the reasons for the difference, and try to come to an agreement. If they cannot agree, a third marker will be appointed. You will receive the total marks with your other module results.
The criteria for assessing the final report are listed below. Please read these carefully as it will help you to see what your assessors will be looking for in your report. Also take into account what you promised to produce for the final report in your initial plan, and your supervisor's and moderator's comments on this on PATS. How far you managed to produce these deliverables is part of the final report assessment.
You can resubmit your final report at any time until the deadline and your supervisor and moderator will not be able to mark this or make any comments online before the deadline. Please discuss your final report with your supervisor at your regular meetings. You can upload parts of the report onto PATS so that your supervisor can look at these (or give the report in any other way to your supervisor). Just upload the files in the file upload section and your supervisor can see these there (you can, but do not have to submit them until you have the final version).
Your supervisor and moderator will assess your final report according to the following criteria:
The scale for this assessment is:
The final part of your project is your project examination, which will take place after the exams. This viva exam will be timetabled any time in the University's Examinations period, usually in exam week 4 and 5. You must therefore remain available at the University until the end of the Examinations. You should not arrange any holidays, employment or other commitments until after this date. The timetable for the viva exams will be published as soon as possible after the submission deadline.
Note, that not attending your viva exam will result in you failing the module (unless you have extenuating circumstances in which case the viva exam will be rescheduled).
Below we explain the procedure that you need to follow for your project examination.
Your project examination is in the form of a viva, conducted by your supervisor and moderator together. The normal format of a viva is this: you demonstrate the work you have done your project to your supervisor and moderator first, and then they ask you some questions on your project. The format of project demonstration may vary. If your project has resulted in some software system or prototype, demonstration of the workings of your software in the lab will be necessary, but no formal presentation is required. If your project is of an analytic nature, then it may be demonstrated through a carefully constructed presentation, showing your analytic process and your findings. The questions that your supervisor and moderator will be asking you after your demo/presentation, will be based around your project, for example, your choice of software, justification for your choice of methodology, your design method, validity of results, etc. It may also involve some general issues in the context of your project and your degree programme. This whole process should last no longer than one hour.
As part of the viva questions, supervisors and moderators will explicitly query you on whether ethical approval was obtained for any elements that involved human participation in some way. You should be aware of the requirements and procedures following a talk in the autumn semester and a reminder email before the spring semester.
The timetable for the vivas will be made available to you, usually by e-mail. Please check your e-mails regularly, particularly nearer the time in case there are last minute changes to the schedule. Five minutes before the time of your viva, you should make yourself ready and wait outside your supervisors's office. Your supervisor and moderator will then ask you to take them to the lab to see your demo. After the demo, you may stay in the lab or go to your supervisor's office for the questions and discuss your project. If your demo is in the form of presentation or uses a laptop, then your supervisor may ask you to do it in his or her room. You can also agree with your supervisor and moderator to meet you in the lab directly, but make sure both of them know about this. Ensure that you are not late for your viva. Missing the viva means that you will fail your project module, unless you have a valid reason for missing it (see extenuating circumstances). If you have any questions regarding the viva and its arrangements for your specific project or there are any special requirements, please discuss this with your supervisor well before the viva date.
IMPORTANT: Make sure that your project is demonstrable on the day. It would be a good idea that you should try it out the night before and then perhaps “minutes” before your viva. This is particularly important for those who have used their own computers/software to develop their projects - the sofware may not work on the School's computers! It is your responsibility to make sure that your project is demonstrable. You can bring in your own equipment for the demonstration, but it is your responsibility to arrange this.
All project demonstrations will be conducted in C/2.05, the PC Lab, which will be set up with Linux, Mac and Windows computers. The lab is reserved for project demonstration only in the viva weeks. To set up your demo, please use other labs - they are all networked and operate in the same way. If you have developed your project using your own computer and you wish to demo your project using your own computer, then you may bring your computer in on the day and place it in C/2.05 for your demo. Note that you may need to register your computer on School's network, so please check with our system administrators. For any more specific requirements for the demo, e.g. specialised hardware, please discuss with your supervisor and our system administrators to find a suitable way to execute the demo.
Contact the project coordinator if you have any queries regarding your viva.
If you wish to make your project available online after it has been completely submitted and marked, you can specify this in PATS. On the project description page you can check “make project public”. This will generate a publication form that will automatically be added to your project. You can see the way your project (as far as it has been submitted) will appear, once published via PATS, in the “Complete Project” tab. Everything visible there will appear in the PATS archive if you select to make your project public. Examiner reports, marks, etc. will of course not be available there. The date by when you must finalise this is shown in the description tab of your project, at the bottom, indicating how long the data can still be modified. A copy of the publication form is here:
Note that we cannot guarantee that your project will be published via PATS or for how long it will remain available online.
This section outlines the kinds of material you need to collect before you can begin writing in earnest. Most of the necessary material will consist of your own ideas and experiences gained while carrying out the project, and your approach to solving the problem you have decided to address. For the background study or literature review you will also need references to various resources such as key books and papers, policy documents, Internet resources, related software, etc.
While working on the project you may find it helpful to keep a notebook handy and record all relevant information. Typically such information will include:
Also, we recommend that you keep a diary of all your project-related activities. This will show the progress made during the life of the project and will provide a record of how you spent your time. In particular, when you are validating, testing and debugging your work, keep a running log of your activities and their outcomes. You will then have a record of the unforeseen difficulties you met and, hopefully, how you resolved them. Summaries of these may well be worth including in the project report (see Implementation).
In general you should supplement the material you generate yourself with relevant material from other sources. A good project report will show that you are aware of relevant work that other people have done (see Background). You should include relevant references to such work in your project report. References to work in periodicals, i.e. magazines and journals, and conference proceedings may be more useful than references to textbooks, as periodicals and conferences are usually more specialised and up to date. References to technical manuals and national and international standards should also be included, where appropriate. You may also cite web sites as sources, if suitable. However, keep in mind that web sites may often contain incomplete or wrong information and in general textbooks or papers are a better reference and show that you have done a more extensive literature review than just searching for some keywords on the Internet.
You should consider, at the beginning of your project, what you need to do to solve the problem you have chosen to address. This will then inform choices about the structure of your reports; your written reports need to be both a “narrative” (telling the story of your project) and an “argument” (providing a logical justification of the steps you have undertaken to solve your chosen problem). Once you have started to gather material you can begin to arrange it in a form which can then be refined into a report, though the outline chapter headings shown below will serve as a good guide in the early stages of your work.
All good project reports whatever their subject, follow certain well-established conventions and have a similar overall shape. They generally consist of a main body surrounded by other information (presented in appropriate formats) that support it in various ways. Some of these are mandatory, others are optional.
Suggestions of the particular structure for the final and interim reports are given in the Interim Report and Final Report topics on this wiki. You should vary the titles of the sections if these are inappropriate for your project - your supervisor is the best person to guide you on this. Here we concentrate on the main body of the report and generic sections for both reports. The supporting information is discussed later. We recommend that you do the same when writing your report, though you should have a plan for your report which will guide you on what material your should be retaining for eventual inclusion.
We look at each of the general sections of the report structure in more detail below. You can use this characteristic structure as a rough template for organising the material. However, often it may be of advantage to adjust the suggested structure to your particular project instead of sticking to the template. Consult your supervisor for advice. It is also a good idea to plan roughly how long each part should be before writing the report, to make sure that the length and overall balance are about right. You can then construct each part to produce a first draft of the main body.
A good introduction should tell the reader what the project is about without assuming special knowledge and without introducing any specific material that might obscure the overview. It should anticipate and combine main points described in more detail in the rest of the project report. Also, importantly, it should enthuse the reader about the project, to encourage them to read the whole report. Normally it should include such things as:
The purpose of the Background section is to provide the typical reader with information that they cannot be expected to know, but which they will need to know in order to fully understand and appreciate the rest of the report. It should explain why the project is addressing the problem described in the report, indicate an awareness of other work relevant to this problem and show clearly that the problem has not been solved by anyone else. This section may describe such things as:
The wider context of the project includes such things as its non-computing aspects. So, for example, if you are producing software or any other products, including business recommendations, for a specific organisation then you should describe aspects of that organisation’s business that are relevant to the project. If you are doing a research oriented, say on particular algorithms, you should also refer to the general problem for which these algorithms are useful (the application(s) for your techniques).
Relevant existing products, documents or artefacts that you should mention could be ones that, for example,
You need only describe things that will be unfamiliar to the potential reader, or are unique to the organisation or topic your project addresses. Your project, if it involves software development, will almost certainly use all kinds of existing software such as language compilers, subroutine libraries, etc., but you can assume that the reader will be fully acquainted with, for example, general purpose programming languages such as Java, C/C++, Fortran, Pascal, Python, PHP, etc,. Also, it may involve the better known specialised packages such as MySQL, ORACLE, OpenGL, etc. You should mention the particular variety and possibly version number, e.g. Java SE 6, but you need say nothing more than that.
If your project depends on any specialist or uncommon software such as specialised subroutine packages or a more obscure or specialised programming language, you should describe them briefly and discuss whatever features are relevant to your project. Often this can be done by comparing it to some well-established piece of software, for example
The Descartes language is like a restricted version of Pascal but with the following extra features: ...
Again, long descriptions of details are to be avoided and references to suitable sources of detailed information should be given instead.
Other background information could consist of the sequence of events leading up to the present situation or the results of earlier investigations. You could also discuss such things as any cost or time constraints imposed on the project.
Your background section should end with a clear statement of the research questions problem your project is trying to answer. These will reflect the aim of your project, but will be different in that they explain the problem you are attempting to solve, e.g.,
Aim: The aim of this project is to develop software for the improved planning of the routing of delivery vehicles to customer locations, that reflects the forecast availability of each customer to receive goods. Research question(s): In order to demonstrate the achievement of the stated aim, this project will identify route planning software currently in use and the underpinning algorithms, define appropriate performance metrics, determine how to express constraints on an alternative algorithm, develop an improved algorithm and demonstrate on what basis it is judged an improvement, and implement the improved algorithm in a usable and robust software package.
Aim: The aim of this project is to develop a business strategy for organisation X that will improve the survivability of X in the face of increasing global competition. Research question(s): In order to develop a business strategy it will be necessary to identify key stakeholders and determine their vision for the organisation at the end of the strategic planning time frame, assess the likely outcome, in terms of the organisation's survivability, of maintaining the current strategy, and develop and assess an alternative set of activities to achieve the stated vision.
The purpose of the Specification and Design sections is to give the reader a clear picture of the system you plan to create, in terms of the capability required. A specification should tell the reader what the software system is required to do. The design then gives the top-level details of how the software system meets the requirement. It will also identify constraints on the software solution, that are important in guiding decision making throughout the development process.
Describing what a software system does (specification) and how it does so (design) effectively usually means describing it from more than one viewpoint. Each viewpoint will convey some information about the system that other viewpoints omit. (You would use the same technique when describing any complicated construction such as a building, an aircraft, a novel or a painting). Possible viewpoints might be:
A common approach is to first define the user or business requirements, then describe the static architecture, identify modules and groups of closely connected modules, and then to apply other views to each of these groups. Fine details, specifically details of code, should be left out.
We strongly recommend that you make extensive use of diagrams, such as entity-relationship diagrams, UML diagrams, state charts, or other pictorial techniques.
As well as describing the system, it is important that you justify its design, for example, by discussing the implications of constraints on your solution and different design choices, and then giving reasons for making the choices you did. Typically these implications will relate to the aims of the project and to aspects of it discussed in the Background section.
The design of the system will almost certainly have evolved while you were developing it. Obviously you should describe its final state but often there are good reasons for describing intermediate states, too; for example, if you want to discuss the details of the design method used or to highlight learning that you later refer to in the Reflection section. If you do this, take special care to make sure the reader does not get confused between different stages of the design.
If you are not designing a system, but testing a hypothesis for a more scientifically oriented project, specification and design sections may not be required in quite the same form. The specification instead becomes a description of the problem and what is required of a solution. The design becomes a description of your approach to solving the problem and your suggested solution(s). For instance, if you are designing an algorithm to solve a particular problem you would have a problem statement section and then a section describing one or more suggested algorithms to solve the problem. Later in the Results and Evaluation section you then describe how to design experiments to test how well the algorithm(s) solve the problem and present your experimental results with an evaluation of your suggested solutions.
The Implementation section is similar to the Specification and Design section in that it describes the system, but it does so at a finer level of detail, down to the code level. This section is about the realisation of the concepts and ideas developed earlier. It can also describe any problems that may have arisen during implementation and how you dealt with them.
Do not attempt to describe all the code in the system, and do not include large pieces of code in this section. Complete source code should be provided separately. Instead pick out and describe just the pieces of code which, for example:
You should also mention any unforeseen problems you encountered when implementing the system and how and to what extent you overcame them. Common problems are:
A seemingly disproportionate amount of project time can be taken up in dealing with such problems. The Implementation section gives you the opportunity to show where that time has gone.
In this section you should describe to what extent you achieved your goals.
You should describe how you demonstrated that the system works as intended (or not, as the case may be). Include comprehensible summaries of the results of all critical tests that were carried out. You might not have had the time to carry out any full rigorous tests - you may not even got as far as producing a testable system. However, you should try to indicate how confident you are about whatever you have produced, and also suggest what tests would be required to gain further confidence.
This is also the place to describe the reasoning behind the tests to evaluate your results, what tests to execute, what the results show and why to execute these tests. It may also contain a discussion of how you are designing your experiments to verify the hypothesis of a more scientifically oriented project. E.g., describe how you compare the performance of your algorithm to other algorithms to indicate better performance and why this is a sound approach. Then summarise the results of the tests or experiments.
You must also critically evaluate your results in the light of these tests, describing its strengths and weaknesses. Ideas for improving it can be carried over into the Future Work section. Remember: no project is perfect, and even a project that has failed to deliver what was intended can achieve a good pass mark, if it is clear that you have learned from the mistakes and difficulties.
This section also gives you an opportunity to present a critical appraisal of the project as a whole. This could include, for example, whether the methodology you have chosen and the programming language used were appropriate.
It is quite likely that by the end of your project you will not have achieved all that you planned at the start; and in any case, your ideas will have grown during the course of the project beyond what you could hope to do within the available time. The Future Work section is for expressing your unrealised ideas. It is a way of recording that 'I have thought about this', and it is also a way of stating what you would like to have done if only you had not run out of time (Remember to take into account Hofstadter’s Law: 'Everything takes longer than you think, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law.'). A good Future Work section should provide a starting point for someone else to continue the work which you have begun.
The Conclusions section should be a summary of the aims of project and a restatement of its main results, i.e. what has been learnt and what it has achieved. An effective set of conclusions should not introduce new material. Instead it should briefly draw out, summarise, combine and reiterate the main points that have been made in the body of the project report and present opinions based on them.
The Conclusions section marks the end of the project report proper. Be honest and objective in your conclusions.
We believe in the concept of “lifelong learning”. One of the principles applied throughout the assessment during your studies is that of the value of reflection. We believe that it is important that we reflect upon our performance in order to identify “transferable learning”, that can be carried over into future activities. Reflection should focus on what Argyris calls “double loop learning”; this is where we identify, not relatively “simple skills”, such as the mastery of a new programming language, but the impact of what we have done on the assumptions, concepts and ideas we used to make decisions about our work. For example, a “reflective practitioner” would try to identify the characteristics of the problem that has been addressed, and consider whether assumptions or decisions about the relevant approach to solving that problem had been appropriate, in order to make a better decision in relation to problems that might be encountered in the future.
We said that you should relate your work to that of other people. Other work explicitly cited should be listed in the Reference section and referred to in the text using some kind of key. It is important that you give proper credit to all work that is not strictly your own, and that you do not violate copyright restrictions.
It may be desirable to provide a Bibliography section separately from the reference section. In general, references are those documents/sources cited within the text. The bibliography lists documents which have informed the text or are otherwise relevant but have not been explicitly cited.
References should be listed in alphabetical order of author's surname(s), and should give sufficient and accurate publication details. For example,
Chikofsky, EJ, Cross, JH. 1990. Reverse Engineering and Design Recovery: A Taxonomy. IEEE Software, 7(1):13-17. Date, CJ. 2000. An Introduction to Database Systems, 7th Edition. Addison-Wesley.
are acceptable references.
There are various conventions for quoting references. For example, you can quote the name of the author and the year of publication, e.g.
For more information see [Chikofsky et al, 1990]. A more detailed description is given by Date .
There are several other variations. For example, some authors prefer to use only the first three or four letters of the name, e.g. [Chi1990] or just to number the references sequentially, e.g. . It can be helpful to the reader if, for books and other long publications, you specify the page number too, e.g. [Date 2000, p. 23].
Whatever convention you choose, be consistent.
Information Services provide a number of leaflets which describe in detail accepted ways of presenting references. For example, guidance on the Harvard Style of citing and referencing may be viewed at http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/insrv/resources/guides/inf057.pdf.
Whatever style of referencing you adopt, it is critical that you are assiduous in acknowledging the sources you have used; failure to do so may lead to suspicions of unfair practice and an investigation into whether or not your work reflects the standards expected of academic research. Guidance on plagiarism and how to avoid it is available at http://learningcentral.cf.ac.uk/bbcswebdav/institution/INSRV/Study%20Skills/plagiarism2/new/index.html.
Note that it is seldom sufficient to simply “cut and paste” material from other sources. When you take material from someone else's work, you are doing so because it helps support your argument, or justify decisions you are making. It is therefore essential to make it clear why you have included material from other sources; in other words, you need to critically assess the work of others, whether it is supporting your position or not:
In summary, you need to ensure that you have clearly assessed the relevance of referenced material to the development of your position, or your argument, and demonstrated that you are justified in taking this material to be authoritative.
Once you have gathered and organised enough material you can turn it into written prose. To write effectively requires sustained concentration over long periods of time. Even with the incremental authoring possibilities that word processing offers, writing is best done in long uninterrupted sessions. Most people find it difficult and tiring.
There are rules you can follow which may make the task easier and which will certainly improve the quality of your writing, but unfortunately there are rather a lot of these and in a guide of this size we can only offer a few pieces of general advice:
The project report's structure does not necessarily dictate the order in which you write it. If you want you can start by writing the Introduction, then the Background section, and so on, but this is up to you. Some people start by writing the Introduction first which gives direction to writing the other sections, but others prefer to leave writing the Introduction until last, as reports rarely turn out as planned. We recommend that you start with the middle sections, then write the Introduction (guiding the reader to what they will find in the report), then the Conclusions (bringing the report together at the end) and Reflection, and finally the Abstract (summing up the entire report). However you tackle the writing up, we recommend that you:
Always keep your potential readers in mind and repeatedly review what you have written, putting yourself in their place. Look at the draft, sentence by sentence, and ask yourself: 'Will this make sense to the readers given their existing knowledge and what I have told them up to now?' You can consider the potential readership as
So, as noted earlier, do not explain things which are common knowledge to such readers.
Also, if your project report is of sufficient quality, your supervisor may consider submitting part of it to a journal for publication as a paper, in which case it may eventually be read by a substantial number of computing and other professionals.
You can often both clarify text and reduce its bulk if you can identify generality or commonality among the ideas you are expressing. You can then revise the text so that the common factors are described first, followed by details of how specific individual ideas differ from them.
The main body of the project report should be divided up into sections, along the lines suggested in Arranging Material and Structuring the Project Report or otherwise, as appropriate. Each section should, if necessary, be divided up into subsections, and so on recursively. Such nesting can be used to suggest some kind of hierarchical relationship between sections. This can become obscure though if the nesting gets to more than about three levels deep.
It is important that you start each section and subsection with a summary of the rest of the material in it, i.e. inform the reader of what you are about to tell them. This has the effect of “softening up” the reader so that when they move on to the body of the section they feel confident about the direction in which you are taking them. They are reassured at regular intervals when they encounter ideas that you have told them to expect. Without the overview the overall effect is like a mystery tour of ideas, with each new idea coming as a surprise. It is sometimes difficult to appreciate the need for this when you are the author because you are already intimately familiar with the whole route that the report takes.
Each major section should begin on a new page. All sections and subsections should be numbered and headed. Numbering should be like this: 3.10.7 – for subsubsection 7 in subsection 10, in section 3.
There are all kinds of stylistic conventions relating to technical writing that you should try to follow. For example:
Writing where the language style or typography, e.g. font or character size, change arbitrarily looks amateurish and can be very distracting for the reader. Use typography to support the content. Other places where consistency should be maintained include:
To some extent you can use your own judgement about what conventions to follow. Whatever you do though, you must be consistent.
Here we mention some well-established descriptive devices which you can use in your project report to improve its quality.
Cross-references are just references to other parts of the same document. For example,
This module contains procedures for operating on variables of type WINDOW (see Section 2.2).
Section numbers will change if sections are added or deleted. Good typesetting or word processing software provides suitable mechanisms to automatically number sections and create such references such that they will always refer to the intended section. Make sure you know how your chosen software does this and select the right software to make this simple. If you use software that does not support cross-references or uses an overly complicated system, it is a good idea to wait until the report is almost complete before putting in any cross-references.
Backward references to sections earlier in the project report can make explicit connections between parts of the document that may not be connected obviously. Forward references can be used, for example, to reassure the reader that you are not going to leave them stranded after you have introduced a new idea without explaining it. For example,
This procedure uses the Volestrangler algorithm (to be described in Section 4.3).
Note that too many forward references are probably an indication that the report could be organised better.
Many word processors have facilities for handling footnotes. By all means use them, in particular when you want to make a comment which is not strictly relevant or which would upset the flow of ideas in the text. If the comment is closely related to the text you may consider including it in parenthesis instead.
Traditionally, collections of items are listed within the text using the adverbs ‘firstly’, ‘secondly’, etc. Often, though, it is clearer to tabulate these items, particularly if there are many of them. The simplest way of doing this is to use a “bullet” list. Various examples of bullet lists appear on this wiki. Sometimes there is a need to nest one list inside another. To distinguish the two lists, the inner one can be indented and have a different symbol. Lists with more than one degree of nesting tend to appear confusing and therefore we do not generally recommend them.
Listed items can also be keyed using numbers, letters, or other labels. Bibliography entries are an example of keyed items (see References). However, keys should only be used when necessary.
A project report that uses figures (i.e. diagrams or other pictorial techniques such as tables) to illustrate ideas will probably be easier to digest than one that does not. We therefore recommend that you use figures wherever appropriate (If you have a graphical rather than a textual/verbal kind of mentality, a good way to write text is to express your ideas in diagrams first and then describe these textually).
Be careful though. When drawing diagrams try to keep to a standard graphical notation that has been introduced during your studies, or that you have seen published widely, and use it consistently. Computer Science, unlike most other professions, has few established conventions governing the use of diagrams and this means that diagrams can sometimes make ideas more obscure rather than clarifying them.
If you feel you have to invent your own notation, remember that the best ones are usually the most economical, i.e. they use only a few different kinds of symbols. Also, you must explain the precise meaning of your symbols in a key. A very common mistake is to use arrows to illustrate some kind of relationship between items without declaring what that relationship is.
Graphics editors (i.e. image processors) can be extremely useful, particularly if you have a great deal of drawing to do or if there is a lot if commonality among the drawings (because cut and paste operations can then be used with great effect). However, some artefacts are difficult to produce using standard software applications, and in such cases it is quite acceptable to present hand-drawn diagrams. To include these into your report you may use a scanner or even take a photograph (or multiple partial photographs that you merge afterwards) of the artefact and include it in your report as any other computer generated image (help from staff for this is available and you may bring the original artefact to the viva).
All figures should be labelled and captioned, for example,
Figure 3.10: Sub-System Architecture.
The label can then be used to refer to the diagram within the text, e.g.
See Figure 3.10.
All diagrams must be explicitly referred to somewhere within the text.
Similar to sections and subsections the labels may change if you insert additional figures or change the structure of the report. Again good typesetting software will support automatic label generation and keeping the references to the figures consistent (see Cross-references).
For some reports it may also be useful to distinguish between figures and tables and use separate labels for them (e.g. Figure 3.1 and Table 3.1 are two separate elements, sometimes also referred to as floats). Figures are diagrams, drawings, images, etc. while tables list information in a tabular layout, e.g. program running times for specific inputs.
It is important when writing about software systems to distinguish in the text between the ordinary natural language you are using and the program code or other literal text. If you are using a word processor which offers both proportionally spaced and fixed width character fonts then there is a straightforward way of doing this. Program code and other literal text can be written in a fixed width font such as “Courier New” while the natural language text can be written with a proportionally spaced font such as “Times New Roman”.
Other similar kinds of text, UNIX commands for example, can be treated in the same way. Some typesetting systems also offer to include “verbatim” text, which you can use to insert small code examples, examples of the output of a program, etc. They are also typeset in a fixed width font. Using a fixed width font means that the code appears in the document much as it would do on a console. If you only have fixed width characters available on your word processor then put program code etc. into italics or bold text.
Note that using more than a few different character fonts, styles or sizes can make text look very untidy. Generally we recommend to use, e.g., a serif font for the main text (or a sans-serif font, if you prefer), a fixed-width font for literal texts as above, and optionally one sans-serif font for headings and captions (this can also be the same font used for the main text). Emphasis can be indicated by italics (or slanted text) or for stronger emphasis use bold text. If you use more fonts you should have a very good reason for this to support the content.
In Arranging Material and Structuring the Project Report we say that a project report consists of a main body plus other supporting material that surround and support the body. There are well established conventions governing the purpose and format of these supporting structures which we describe here. The structures include, in order of appearance in the project report:
Then comes the main body of the report, and this is followed possibly by:
Each of the elements listed above should begin on a new page. All pages should be numbered, with page 1 being the first page of the Introduction. The pages preceding the Introduction should be given Roman numerals (i, ii, iii, iv, etc).
The title page should be the first page of the report and should normally include:
The title itself should be short, yet should aim to describe the contents of the project report as accurately as possible.
This is a summary of the report. It must be less than 300 words long. It should give enough information to allow a potential reader to decide whether or not the report will be of interest to them. It should briefly describe the main ideas of the report, including the aims and conclusions. It should be both self-contained and self-explanatory, and it should not say anything not mentioned in the rest of the report (for this reason it is usually written last).
This optional section should be used to record indebtedness for the use of facilities or help from particular sources. You should mention any organisations or people who have helped you while you have been carrying out the project.
The table of contents gives the reader a view of the detailed structure of the report, by giving section and subsection headings and associated pages.
If your project report contains many figures or it refers to the same figure many times you should consider listing them along with their page numbers in a table of figures.
If you use any abbreviations, obscure terms or esoteric acronyms in the project report then their meaning should be explained where they first occur. If you go on to use any of them extensively then it is helpful to list them all in a table at the end so that readers can quickly remind themselves of their meaning.
Appendices are where you present material which you want to include in the report, but which would seriously obstruct the flow of ideas if put anywhere in the main body. This could be extensive technical details or mathematical proofs, derivations of formulae, etc. required to support a point your are making in the report. Other documents you have written, such as user manuals, technical manuals or formal specifications should go here too.
Appendices should be headed by letters in alphabetical order, i.e. Appendix A, Appendix B, etc.
Here is a summary of our main recommendations for writing reports:
This is a list of general typesetting rules for the undergraduate final year project reports.
Ensure you stick to the word limit assigned for the specific report, as stated in the module guidelines. The word count does not include the supporting structures, but only the contents of the main report sections, excluding front-matter, figures and tables, and appendices. There is no minimum length but it is mainly through the report that your project will be judged so the report should adequately reflect the work done in the project.
Reports should be typeset in a 12pt font.
Reports should have single line spacing. The report should be economical on paper. It should not, for example, contain excessive amounts of whitespace. Only the major sections need to begin on a new page.
Reports should be typeset with some word-processing system, e.g. LaTeX, LibreOffice or Word. The final project report should be presented as a PDF file with any other documentation in the appendices of the report. Artefacts produced for the project that are to be processed by other software such as a compiler or interpreter should be submitted as separate file(s). If files are submitted as an archive, it should be in zip format (other formats can be uploaded, but will be converted automatically into zip by PATS). Typically this will be the source code for software developed for the project. For details see the Submission Guide.
The guides on this wiki are not complete. Textbooks usually demonstrate good technical writing especially if they are produced by a reputable publisher. They also provide illustrations of the use of descriptive devices, etc.
Below is a list of other books and Internet resources, specifically designed to assist in writing essays and reports.
Finally, there will be specific aspects of your project reports that only your supervisor can advise you on. It is important that you discuss an outline of the reports with your supervisor before you begin to write up.
Bly, R. 10 Ways To Improve Your Technical Writing, Center for Technical Communication. http://smartbiz.com/sbs/arts/bly10.htm [accessed January 2011].
Capital Community College Foundation. Guide to Grammar & Writing. http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/ [accessed January 2011].
Creme, P, Lea, MR. 2008. Writing at University: A Guide for Students. 3rd edition. Open Unniversity Press. Contains help for all aspects of writing while at university.
Document Foundation, The. LibreOffice Documentation. http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/documentation/ [accessed January 2011].
Duprė, L. 1998. Bugs in Writing: Guide to Debugging your Prose. 2nd edition. Addison-Welsey. Contains tips in small, individual chapters to improve your writing; a good reference book.
Fry, R. 2004. Improve Your Writing. 5th edition. Delmar Cengage Learning. This is a guide for students producing a written project. Easy to read, full of handy hints, and guides you through the whole process from carrying out research for your report through to producing the final draft.
Landsberger, J. Study Guides and Strategies. http://www.studygs.net/ [accessed January 2011].
LaTeX Project Team. LaTeX - A document preparation system. http://www.latex-project.org/ [accessed January 2011].
Oracle. The OpenOffice.org Documentation Project. http://documentation.openoffice.org/ [accessed January 2011].
Strunk Jr, W, White, EB. 1918. The Elements of Style. WP Humphrey, Ithaca, NY. http://www.crockford.com/wrrrld/style.html [accessed January 2011]. Excellent guide to good use of English, a classic reference book, meanwhile updated and republished many times.
Word MVPs. The Word MVP Site. http://word.mvps.org/ [accessed January 2011].
This explains how to submit the deliverables for your final year project. All deliverables must be submitted via PATS, except for physical artefacts (details below). For details of what needs to be included for the various deliverables, please see the guidelines specific to your final year project module. All submissions must contain at least one PDF file in the document section or they will not be accepted by PATS and so submission cannot be completed.
PATS enables you to submit nearly all parts of your project online. Each submission consists of a collection of files under the following sections:
Note that, of course, not all file types need to be included with each submission. What is suitable depends on your project and your report and please discuss with your supervisor what you should be submitting if you are unsure.
To add files to these sections, press the related [Upload] link which opens a separate upload dialog. You can select more than one file at once to upload into a section in that dialog before you press the “Upload” button. Once you have uploaded a file you can view its type, file size, MD5 and SHA1 checksum via the provided link. You can use the MD5 or SHA1 checksum to verify the integrity of the file (also see checksums). You can further rename, delete and move the file up or down in the list in each section. You cannot move files between sections.
After you have uploaded at least one file to the document section you can complete the submission. This will generate a zip file containing all the files you have uploaded in all sections, sorted by these sections and in order they are displayed in the submission area. Your files count as submitted only after you have completed the submission. While files in the content area are visible to your supervisor and moderator, they cannot actually mark them.
You can resubmit at any time before the deadline (all deadlines are by 23:00 on the day shown). A resubmission will completely replace the previously submitted files and not extend the previous submission, so always upload all files into the submission area and then submit them all at once by completing the submission.
The system will keep the current and the previous submission archive. You can delete these archives at any time before the deadline and also download the archives to verify their contents. If you wish to check the archive before completing the submission, select the “Preview Submission” button.
Make sure you check the contents of any files you upload in the file submission area and especially the contents of the final submission archive. Files uploaded via the network may sometimes be corrupted and downloading them again to verify their content avoids any problems. To verify they files you may also use the MD5 or SHA1 checksums.
Your supervisor and moderator will be able to see any of the files you have in the submission area and your current and previous submission archive (unless you delete them).
See the PDF Guide for information on how to create a PDF file.
Some projects may also produce physical artefacts without any digital versions of them. Hardware or similar physical objects do not need to be submitted, but should be available for demonstration at the oral examination and your report should contain sufficient information to rebuild these. Any manually created documentation necessary for your project should, however, be included in the archive in a digitised format.
Anything that fits on an A4 page or smaller can be scanned and directly included in the report as a figure. For documents larger than A4 we recommend taking photos of these and submit the image files via PATS. If a single photo is insufficient due to resolution limitations you can take multiple overlapping photos of the document and combine these into a single image. This applies in particular to large soft system models drawn manually.
In addition to the digitised version, the documents larger than A4 should also be handed in by the submission deadline to the COMSC office in a suitable envelope. On the envelope clearly write your name, the title of your project and the names of your supervisor and moderator. The document will not be archived, but used by your supervisor and moderator to decide your mark and will be available at the oral examination. It will be returned to you after the oral examination.
Assistance is available to create digital versions of such large documents from the project coordinators and the computer support officers. If you cannot take any suitable images of the document, contact them for assistance (to take one or multiple photos and merge them, etc.).
After you submitted your files on PATS as an archive (not just uploaded them into the submission area) your project report or plan counts as submitted and you do not have to do anything else. We do not expect any problems with the network connection, the server or the integrity of your submitted file. However, to avoid any problems with the integrity of your submission and to deal with any problems arising from the server, the Internet connection or anything else that prevents you from submitting the project in time (i.e. on the day of the submission deadline), please follow these instructions:
While the procedure is optional it avoids any problems arising from the online submission. If you provide an MD5 checksum, then the following applies:
For details on how to generate MD5 checksums, etc. please see checksums
You are free to use any file types as long as they are suitable for the submission section. However, in general we recommend the following file formats, unless there is a good reason for your project to use a different format:
This section describes how to prepare PDF files for your final year project. Independent of the program you are using to write the document and create the PDF file, the PDF file must fulfil the following conditions:
We also recommend that you turn off any additional image compression during the PDF generation to preserve the original image quality. Furthermore, the PDF file should be generated for 300dpi or higher (print or prepress settings are ok). Screen resolutions, etc. may be of insufficient quality to easily read or print your documents.
The method you choose to create your PDF file is up to you, of course. However, there are several methods that most people use as described below. Following these methods will ensure your document fulfils the above conditions.
Once you created the PDF file you are highly advised to carefully proofread the resulting PDF file using acroread, available at http://get.adobe.com/reader/ (also installed on all COMSC computers). In particular check that the PDF file does not differ from the original file in any significant way.
If you are using TeX or LaTeX there are two basic options to create a PDF file: directly generate the PDF file with PDFTeX / PDFLaTeX or create the PDF file from a DVI file. For special TeX frontends and implementations for various platforms, commercial version, etc. you should refer to the documentation of these programs.
We recommend to use PDFTeX / PDFLaTeX directly by calling pdflatex or pdftex command to create a PDF file. Note that there are some small differences between these commands and the original latex or tex commands, which produce DVI files. To avoid any problems you should choose which version you use before you write the complete document.
The standard version of TeX and LaTeX produce DVI files. To generate acceptable PDF files from these, first convert the DVI file to PostScript with the following command:
dvips -Ppdf -G0 -t a4 -o FILE.ps FILE.dvi
Then you should run the ps2pdf program to create the PDF file from the PostScript file:
ps2pdf -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress \ -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 \ -dAutoFilterColorImages=false \ -dAutoFilterGrayImages=false \ -dColorImageFilter=/FlateEncode \ -dGrayImageFilter=/FlateEncode \ -dMonoImageFilter=/FlateEncode \ -dDownsampleColorImages=false \ -dDownsampleGrayImages=false \ FILE.ps FILE.pdf
There are various ways to generate a PDF file under Microsoft Word. The following three sections describe the most common options.
Newer Word programs offer under the save menu point the option to save the file as a PDF file. You may have to install a separate option in order for this to work. In general this may be best best option to generate a PDF. Make sure you turn off image compression and select at least 300dpi resolution.
PrimoPDF is a free program available at http://www.primopdf.com/. It installs a PDF printer which can be used to generate the PDF file as well. For details on how to use it see its documentation.
If you are using OpenOffice to write your report export the file in PDF format using the File → Export As PDF … menu. Under the options window provided you do not need to select any of the special options. But make sure you turn off JPEG compression by selecting lossless compression to avoid image quality problems and we also do not recommend reducing the image resolution.
A checksum (or hash) is a datum computed from digital data to verify the integrity of that data. Typically you use a program to compute the checksum of a file. Then after this file has been transmitted to some other location the same checksum algorithm is used to compute the checksum there. If the two checksums are the same, it is unlikely that the data has been changed during transmission.
You can use MD5 or SHA1 checksums to verify the files you submit via PATS in this way. We also use it to enable you to hand in a submission late, while you can prove that is has been generated before the deadline. For this you simply have to send the checksum to use before the submission deadline. Read the Submission Guide for details.
Below you find instructions of how to generate MD5 and SHA1 checksums.
It is usually sufficient to use MD5 checksums and by default we expect you to submit an MD5 checksum. It looks something like this:
Please make sure you submit the hexadecimal MD5 sum.
In order to generate such a checksum you may use the following MD5 checksum generators:
Alternatively you can also use SHA1 checksums. A SHA1 checksum looks something like this:
In order to generate such a checksum you may use the following SHA1 checksum generators:
In exceptional circumstances alternative checksums that are at least as reliable as an MD5 checksum may be acceptable (e.g. GNU-PG/PGP file signatures). But please contact Frank Langbein early if you intend to use one of these checksum mechanisms.