This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
team_report [2015/09/27 16:28] – scmfcl | team_report [2015/11/15 16:47] – [Marking Criteria] scmfcl | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The title of the team report document should be "Team Report" | The title of the team report document should be "Team Report" | ||
- | <WRAP center round box 60%> | + | <code> |
- | *Declaration* | + | Declaration |
- | By submitting this report each of its authors are accepting the terms of the following declaration. | + | By submitting this report each of its authors are accepting the terms of |
+ | the following declaration. | ||
- | I hereby declare that my contribution to this document is all my own work, that it has not previously been submitted for assessment and that I have not knowingly allowed it to be copied by another student. I understand that deceiving or attempting to deceive examiners by passing off the work of another writer, as one’s own is plagiarism. I also understand that plagiarising another’s work or knowingly allowing another | + | I hereby declare that my contribution to this document is all my own work, |
- | student to plagiarise from my work is against the University regulations and that doing so will | + | that it has not previously been submitted for assessment and that I have |
- | result in loss of marks and possible disciplinary proceedings. | + | not knowingly allowed it to be copied by another student. I understand |
- | </WRAP> | + | that deceiving or attempting to deceive examiners by passing off the work |
+ | of another writer, as one’s own is plagiarism. I also understand that | ||
+ | plagiarising another’s work or knowingly allowing another student to | ||
+ | plagiarise from my work is against the University regulations and that | ||
+ | doing so will result in loss of marks and possible disciplinary | ||
+ | proceedings. | ||
+ | </code> | ||
Ensure that every author has seen the final document with this declaration and is aware of its implications. | Ensure that every author has seen the final document with this declaration and is aware of its implications. | ||
Line 56: | Line 63: | ||
Your supervisor and moderator will mark your plan according to the following criteria: | Your supervisor and moderator will mark your plan according to the following criteria: | ||
- | * Project description with aims and objectives | + | * Project |
- | * A suitable, well-justified | + | * Clarity and detail of project |
- | * Legal, social, ethical and professional issues: Clear understanding | + | * Suitability and justification of project management and software development |
- | * Team working: Quality and extent | + | * Quality of discussion of associated |
- | * System requirements: Coherency and completeness of functional and non-functional systems requirements with clear justification/ | + | * Level of understanding, consideration |
- | * Acceptance criteria: | + | * Effectiveness |
- | * Good, high-level, expandable | + | * Requirements Specification (20%): |
- | * Integration: | + | * Coherency and completeness of functional and non-functional systems requirements with clear justification/ |
- | * Work plan is feasible, sufficiently specific | + | * Testable acceptance criteria are associated with both the functional and non-functional requirements |
- | * The report | + | * Identification of system scope and boundaries with clear declaration of any assumptions made. |
+ | * Software architecture (20%): | ||
+ | * Quality of documentation of main components, interactions, services | ||
+ | * Level of detail | ||
+ | * Quality and suitability of software architecture adopting core concepts and principles of good software design relating to decomposition, | ||
+ | * Level of alignment | ||
+ | * Work plan (20%): | ||
+ | * Quality of work plan, feasibility and specificity | ||
+ | * Clarity of timeline and milestones | ||
+ | * Suitability of deliverables | ||
+ | * Suitability of meeting schedule and approximate dates for at least two review meetings per student are given | ||
+ | * Amount | ||
+ | * Communication skills (20%): | ||
+ | * Quality of report | ||
+ | * Clarity | ||
+ | * Frontmatter contains all required information and the declaration | ||
- | All criteria carry equal weight for the mark of the team report and will be evaluated on the following | + | All main criteria carry the weight |
- | * 70 - 100% - Excellent | + | |
- | * 55 - 69% - Good | + | * **60 - 60% - Good** (competent, reasoned, coherent, content very sound, few errors/ |
- | * 40 - 54% - Satisfactory | + | |
- | * 1 - 39% - Unsatisfactory | + | * **40 - 49% - Bare Pass** (Passable, basic relevant content, weaknesses in execution errors or omissions) |
- | * 0% indicates that the team has not adequately | + | |
+ | | ||
Supervisor and moderator will mark the report independently and your overall mark for the report is the average of the two marks. | Supervisor and moderator will mark the report independently and your overall mark for the report is the average of the two marks. | ||
Supervisor and moderator will provide formal feedback about your report explaining any concerns they may have and their expectations regarding the aims and objectives and deliverables. You will further get informal feedback from your supervisor in your meetings. Make sure you consider this when executing the remainder of the project. | Supervisor and moderator will provide formal feedback about your report explaining any concerns they may have and their expectations regarding the aims and objectives and deliverables. You will further get informal feedback from your supervisor in your meetings. Make sure you consider this when executing the remainder of the project. | ||
+ | Team Report coursework instructions: |