This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
team_report [2015/09/27 16:50] – [Marking Criteria] scmfcl | team_report [2015/11/15 16:47] – [Marking Criteria] scmfcl | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
Your supervisor and moderator will mark your plan according to the following criteria: | Your supervisor and moderator will mark your plan according to the following criteria: | ||
- | * Project description with aims and objectives | + | * Project |
- | * A suitable, well-justified | + | * Clarity and detail of project |
- | * Legal, social, ethical and professional issues: Clear understanding | + | * Suitability and justification of project management and software development |
- | * Team working: Quality and extent | + | * Quality of discussion of associated |
- | * System requirements: Coherency and completeness of functional and non-functional systems requirements with clear justification/ | + | * Level of understanding, consideration |
- | * Acceptance criteria: | + | * Effectiveness |
- | * Good, high-level, expandable | + | * Requirements Specification (20%): |
- | * Integration: | + | * Coherency and completeness of functional and non-functional systems requirements with clear justification/ |
- | * Work plan is feasible, sufficiently specific | + | * Testable acceptance criteria are associated with both the functional and non-functional requirements |
- | * The report | + | * Identification of system scope and boundaries with clear declaration of any assumptions made. |
+ | * Software architecture (20%): | ||
+ | * Quality of documentation of main components, interactions, services | ||
+ | * Level of detail | ||
+ | * Quality and suitability of software architecture adopting core concepts and principles of good software design relating to decomposition, | ||
+ | * Level of alignment | ||
+ | * Work plan (20%): | ||
+ | * Quality of work plan, feasibility and specificity | ||
+ | * Clarity of timeline and milestones | ||
+ | * Suitability of deliverables | ||
+ | * Suitability of meeting schedule and approximate dates for at least two review meetings per student are given | ||
+ | * Amount | ||
+ | * Communication skills (20%): | ||
+ | * Quality of report | ||
+ | * Clarity | ||
+ | * Frontmatter contains all required information and the declaration | ||
- | All criteria carry the weight as indicated above for the mark of the team report and will be evaluated on the following scale: | + | All main criteria carry the weight as indicated above for the mark of the team report and will be evaluated on the following scale: |
- | * *70 - 100% - Excellent* (rigorous, methodical, analytic, content meets all requirements of the work, very few errors or omissions) | + | |
- | * *60 - 60% - Good* (competent, reasoned, coherent, content very sound, few errors/ | + | |
- | * *50 - 59% - Fair* (satisfactory, | + | |
- | * *40 - 49% - Bare Pass* (Passable, basic relevant content, weaknesses in execution errors or omissions) | + | |
- | * *1 - 39% - Fail* (not passable, evident weaknesses, gaps in content, evident errors or omissions) | + | |
- | * *0%* indicates that the team has *not at all covered* the topic or addressed the issue. | + | |
Supervisor and moderator will mark the report independently and your overall mark for the report is the average of the two marks. | Supervisor and moderator will mark the report independently and your overall mark for the report is the average of the two marks. | ||
Supervisor and moderator will provide formal feedback about your report explaining any concerns they may have and their expectations regarding the aims and objectives and deliverables. You will further get informal feedback from your supervisor in your meetings. Make sure you consider this when executing the remainder of the project. | Supervisor and moderator will provide formal feedback about your report explaining any concerns they may have and their expectations regarding the aims and objectives and deliverables. You will further get informal feedback from your supervisor in your meetings. Make sure you consider this when executing the remainder of the project. | ||
+ | Team Report coursework instructions: |