Site Tools


team_report

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
team_report [2015/09/27 17:29] scmfclteam_report [2015/11/15 16:47] – [Marking Criteria] scmfcl
Line 68: Line 68:
     * Quality of discussion of associated risks and how these will be mitigated     * Quality of discussion of associated risks and how these will be mitigated
     * Level of understanding, consideration and broader appreciation of legal, ethical and social issues     * Level of understanding, consideration and broader appreciation of legal, ethical and social issues
-    * Effectiveness of communication between team members and other stakeholders via all appropriate media+    * Effectiveness of communication and suggested methods
   * Requirements Specification (20%):   * Requirements Specification (20%):
     * Coherency and completeness of functional and non-functional systems requirements with clear justification/derivation     * Coherency and completeness of functional and non-functional systems requirements with clear justification/derivation
Line 79: Line 79:
     * Level of alignment of individual team members' components to integrate into a complete system     * Level of alignment of individual team members' components to integrate into a complete system
   * Work plan (20%):   * Work plan (20%):
-   * Quality of work plan, feasibility and specificity to the project +    * Quality of work plan, feasibility and specificity to the project 
-   * Clarity of timeline and milestones and how these are achieved +    * Clarity of timeline and milestones and how these are achieved 
-   * Suitability of deliverables and assignment of work to team members +    * Suitability of deliverables and assignment of work to team members 
-   * Suitability of meeting schedule and approximate dates for at least two review meetings per student are given +    * Suitability of meeting schedule and approximate dates for at least two review meetings per student are given 
-   * Amount of work is suitable for the credits and level of the module.+    * Amount of work is suitable for the credits and level of the module.
   * Communication skills (20%):   * Communication skills (20%):
-    * Quality of writing and structure+    * Quality of report writing and structure
     * Clarity of expression without going into unnecessary detail     * Clarity of expression without going into unnecessary detail
     * Frontmatter contains all required information and the declaration     * Frontmatter contains all required information and the declaration
Line 100: Line 100:
 Supervisor and moderator will provide formal feedback about your report explaining any concerns they may have and their expectations regarding the aims and objectives and deliverables. You will further get informal feedback from your supervisor in your meetings. Make sure you consider this when executing the remainder of the project. Supervisor and moderator will provide formal feedback about your report explaining any concerns they may have and their expectations regarding the aims and objectives and deliverables. You will further get informal feedback from your supervisor in your meetings. Make sure you consider this when executing the remainder of the project.
  
 +Team Report coursework instructions: {{::cm3301-teamreport.odt|ODT}} {{::cm3301-teamreport.pdf|PDF}}